AIMPROVING COMMUNICАTIVЕ COMPЕTЕNCЕ OF PHILOLOGICАL ЕDUCАTION STUDENTS
Keywords:
compеtеncе, communicаtivе, philologicаl, еducаtion, prаgmаtic compеtеncе, linguistic, task-based language teaching, interactive learning, digital toolsAbstract
Thе аrticlе deals with the development of communicative competence is a fundamental component in the training of philological education students, as it equips them with the skills necessary for effective verbal and non-verbal communication across diverse contexts. This study explores modern approaches and methods to enhance communicative competence among students majoring in philology. Drawing on both theoretical frameworks and practical research, the paper identifies key strategies that foster linguistic, sociocultural, and pragmatic aspects of communication. These include task-based language teaching, interactive learning, and digital tools designed to simulate real-life communication scenarios. An experimental study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of these strategies in improving students' abilities to apply communicative skills in academic and professional environments. Results showed a marked improvement in language proficiency, cultural adaptability, and overall communicative competence, suggesting that a multi-faceted approach is crucial for the comprehensive development of these skills.
References
1. Азимов Э.Г., Щукин А.Н. Современный словарь методических терминов и понятий (теория и практика обучения языкам). Москва: Русский язык. Курсы, 2018.
2. Byram, M. (2021). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Multilingual Matters.
3. Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1-47.
4. Kiely, R., & Rea-Dickins, P. (2021). Performance-based assessment of language proficiency in classroom settings. Language Testing, 38(2), 227-246.
5. Кипнес Л.В. Университетские образовательные округа: опыт реализации инновационных и просветительских проектов. Университетский округ: прошлое и настоящее. 2014; № 1: 14 – 19.
6. Larsen-Freeman, D., & Anderson, M. (2020). Techniques and principles in language teaching. Oxford University Press.
7. Li, S., & Song, Y. (2021). Communicative competence and the role of pragmatics in language education. Journal of Pragmatics, 178, 59-68.
8. Norris, J., Davis, D., & Malone, M. (2020). Performance-based language assessment: Current practices and future directions. Language Learning, 70(S1), 1-20.
9. Porto, M., & Houghton, S. (2022). Developing intercultural communicative competence through language education: Case studies in language and identity. Cambridge University Press.
10. Sundqvist, P., & Wikström, P. (2020). The impact of digital technologies on language learning: Perspectives from research on informal language use. Language Learning & Technology, 24(3), 1-15.
11. Щукин А.Н. Методика преподавания русского языка как иностранного: учебное пособие для вузов. Москва: Высшая школа, 2003.
12. Tareva, E. (2022). Task-based learning and its role in developing communicative competence in philological education. Journal of Language Education, 8(2), 44-60.
13. Zhu, X., & Wang, Y. (2021). Technology-enhanced language learning for improving communicative competence. Computer-Assisted Language Learning, 34(6), 507-525.
14. Сарсенбаева З. Ж. Педагогические возможности повышения лингвокультурологической компетенции средствами изучения пословиц //Colloquium-journаl. – Голопристанський міськрайонний центр зайнятості, 2021. – №. 5 (92). – С. 22-24.
15. Sаrsеnbаеvа Z. COMPАRING LINGUISTIC DЕVICЕS IN ЕNGLISH АND UZBЕK NON-RЕАLISTIC WORKS //Молодые ученые. – 2023. – Т. 1. – №. 15. – С. 32-34.
