PHONETIC INTERFERENCE IN COMPARATIVE AND CONTRASTIVE PHONETICS: AN ANALYSIS OF PRONUNCIATION DIFFICULTIES IN UZBEK AND ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

Authors

  • Temirova H. B. Uzbekistan, Termez, Termez State University, PhD student of faculty of foreign languages philology

Keywords:

Phonetic Interference, Comparative Phonetics, Contrastive Phonetics, Pronunciation Difficulties, Uzbek Learners, English Learners, Negative Transfer, Vowel Pronunciation, Phonological Errors, Language Learning

Abstract

Phonetic interference arises when learners transfer pronunciation patterns from their native language to a new language, causing difficulties in pronunciation. This phenomenon is examined through comparative and contrastive phonetics, focusing on Uzbek and English. In comparative phonetics, interference is less frequent among related languages, as seen in the French and German examples, where native language phonetic patterns influence English pronunciation. In contrast, non-related languages, such as Uzbek and English, exhibit more pronounced interference due to significant phonetic differences. This study highlights specific challenges Uzbek learners face, such as mispronunciations of English sounds that do not exist in Uzbek, difficulties with vowel differentiation, and issues with consonant clusters and silent letters. Understanding these interferences provides insights into addressing pronunciation difficulties and improving language instruction.

References

Abduazizov, A.A. (2006). English Phonetics: Theoretical Course. Tashkent.

2. Al-Homoud, E., & Schmitt, N. (2009). Extensive reading in a challenging environment: A comparison of extensive reading programs in Saudi Arabian and Kuwaiti tertiary institutions. Language Teaching Research, 13(4), 383-401.

3. Bekleyen, N. (2007). An investigation of English teacher candidates’ problems related to listening skill. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 6(21), 91-105. Retrieved from http://www.esosder.com/dergi/2191-105.pdf

4. Cook, V. (2001). Using the first language in the classroom. Canadian Modern Language Review, 57(3), 402-423.

5. Flege, J. E., Munro, M. J., & MacKay, I. R. (1995). Factors affecting strength of perceived foreign accent in a second language. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97(5), 3125-3134.

6. Gimson, A. C. (1962). An Introduction to the Pronunciation of English. Edward Arnold.

7. Hayes, B. (2009). Introductory Phonology. Wiley-Blackwell.

8. Hoshimov, O., & Yoqubov, I. (2003). Ingliz Tili O’qitish Metodikasi. Toshkent: “Sharq” Nashriyoti.

9. Kingston, J., & Diehl, R. L. (1994). Phonetic knowledge. Language, 70(3), 419-454.

10. Major, R. C. (1992). Losing English as a first language. Language in Society, 21(2), 203-223.

Downloads

Published

2024-11-30

How to Cite

Temirova H. B. (2024). PHONETIC INTERFERENCE IN COMPARATIVE AND CONTRASTIVE PHONETICS: AN ANALYSIS OF PRONUNCIATION DIFFICULTIES IN UZBEK AND ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS. Hamkor Konferensiyalar, 1(7), 465–469. Retrieved from https://academicsbook.com/index.php/konferensiya/article/view/880